An interesting story I read on the BBC website yesterday entitled ‘Can painting a mountain restore a glacier?’. A local community in Peru are painting a mountain white using lime, industrial egg white and water. The aim being to change the surface albedo (a measure of how strongly an object reflects light). Whitewashing the mountain will mean the sunlight is reflected off the surface (rather than being absorbed) and thus cooling the microclimate hopefully making conditions more favourable for the disappearing glacier. Will this be enough to save the glacier – who knows! A couple of degrees lower could be enough to slow or holt the decline, at least in the short-term. Of course it will not change the regional decline of glacier coverage in the Andes.
Geoengineering is the scientific term used to describe deliberately manipulating physical, chemical, or biological aspects of the Earth system. If mitigation (reducing emissions) and adaptation (increasing capacity to cope with climate impacts) fail then large scale geoengineering may be required as a last resort to reduce major negative consequences of climate change. A position statement on geoengineering the climate system from the American Geophysical Union (AGU) of which I belong can be found here. Elsewhere the Royal Society of London has published a comprehensive report (details found on this page) that also advocates extreme caution in the possible use of such approaches and their feasibility while encouraging research efforts in this interesting area.
This is a further look at a topic started in a previous post. We were considering the biblical phrase “a land flowing with milk and honey”. A history of the English phrase can be found in Michael Macrone book Brush Up Your Bible!:
“Though the medieval British diet must have differed considerably from the ancient Israelites’, the phrase “land of milk and honey” is one of the earliest biblical expressions to have made its way into English (ca. A.D. 1000), via Aelfric’s rendering of Numbers 16: 13. “Flowing with milk and honey,” however, had to wait for Wyclif’s 1382 translation of Ezekiel (20: 6). The phrase had apparently embedded itself in English speech by the time William Tyndale used it in translating the present passage, for he claimed never to have glanced at Wyclif or any other English version of the Bible.”
However, the meaning of the original hebrew phrase is much more difficult to grasp; in particular the meaning of the hebrew word for honey. Here are a few comments by the experts.
Nahum Sarna says this:
” … Honey in the Bible (Heb. devash) is predominantly the thick, sweet syrup produced from dates … While the date itself is never mentioned, the inclusion of honey among the seven characteristic products of the land listed in Deut. 8:8 indicates that, like all the others, it too derives from the soil.” (JPS commentary on Exodus 3:8)
If it means dates then why isn’t the word for dates used? By the way it’s not that dates are never mentioned in the whole bible (see 2 Samuel 6:19) just in this particular phrase. Also wild bee honey would still be a product of a bountiful land.
Baruch Levine makes this assessment:
” … this depiction projects a land with plentiful, milk-producing herds and flocks and abounding in fruit trees, especially date palm.” (JPS commentary on Lev. 20:24)
Again, if it meant fruit of the land, then why not mention fruit trees or a particular fruit, such as, for example, happens in Exodus 15:27.
Jacob Milgrom (who passed away this week) makes this note:
‘ … Hebrew devash, “honey”, stems from wild bees or dates, most likely the latter; compare Joel 4:18, where milk and fruit juice (must) are parallel (cf. also Gen. 43:11; Deut. 8:8). The figure may be metaphoric: “fruits pure as milk and sweet as honey.” ‘ (JPS commentary on Num. 13:27)
Interesting, but again I don’t buy it, this can’t be how the phrase was meant in the previous earlier references and the Joel reference seems a bit spurious.
The scientific article I refer to in the previous post, says this:
“The Bible commonly refers to Israel as “a land flowing with milk and honey,” but in only two cases does this description clearly refer to bee honey, both in relation to wild bees (Judg. 14:8-9 and 1 Sam. 14:25-29).”
This sentence is awkward, the two references given are not in fact directly linked to the phrase ‘a land flowing with milk and honey’, but they do have the word ‘honey’. In addition I can’t see how Deut 32:13 and Ps. 81:17 can be anything other than references to wild bee honey.
Perhaps the strongest evidence for the domestication of bees in the biblical texts is from Job 20:17:
“Let him not enjoy the streams, The rivers of honey, the brooks of cream.” (JPS)
Both the fact that cream isn’t a naturally occurring product and the shear abundance/volume of honey suggests to me human honey production is in mind. How about also 2 Samuel 17: 28-29:
“… presented … wheat, barley, flour, parched grain, beans, lentils, parched grain, honey, curds, a flock, and cheese from the herd for David and the troops with him to eat. ” (JPS)
Again seems likely to me that honey here is a product of trade, but also available in quantities that suggest production from domestication, as likewise do Jer 41:8 and Ezek 27:17.
A land flowing with milk and honey, referring to the bounty of the promised land, first appears in Exodus 3:8:
“So I have come down to rescue them from the hand of the Egyptians and to bring them up out of that land into a good and spacious land, a land flowing with milk and honey—the home of the Canaanites, Hittites, Amorites, Perizzites, Hivites and Jebusites.” (TNIV)
and subsequently occurs 19 times in the Hebrew bible (see Exodus 3:17, 13:5, 33:3, Leviticus 20:24, Numbers 13:27, 14:8, 16:13, 16:14, Deuteronomy 6:3, 11:9, 26:9, 26:15, 27:3, 31:20, Joshua 5:6, Jeremiah 11:5, 32:22, Ezekiel 20:6, 20:15).
The scholarly assumption up to now had been that the ‘honey’ was not actually bee honey, but that the hebrew word most likely refers to a sweet syrup perhaps extracted from dates as there was no evidence for apiculture (agricultural beekeeping) in this early period. (Incidentally the milk was most probably goats milk rather than cows).
However, this consensus has now been overturned thanks to a remarkable discovery “of unfired clay cylinders similar to traditional hives still used in the Near East at the site of Tel Reh:ov in the Jordan valley in northern Israel suggesting that a large-scale apiary was located inside the town, dating to the 10th–early 9th centuries B.C.E..” (Bloch et al., 2010)
A new article entitled “Industrial apiculture in the Jordan valley during Biblical times with Anatolian honeybees” by Guy Bloch, Tiago M. Francoy, Ido Wachtel, Nava Pantiz-Cohen, Stefan Fuchs, and Amihai Mazar was published yesterday in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS). This academic article can be downloaded here (if you have subscription access). A well written newspaper article in the LA Times does a very nice job of summarizing the work. Credit to the bibleplaces blog for first posting these links.
The recent scientific findings confirms industrial apiculture during Biblical times (corresponding to the period of the United Monarchy of David and Solomon).